teddit

overwhelming feedback from new users is that the content on farcaster is often too farcaster-centric.

sharing a few topics i would love to read more on farcaster (and please lmk if any of these are in your wheelhouse bc i would love to help amplify!):

1. popular culture! trend analyses and insights on culture (and not crypto culture). tell us what do gen z and gen alpha (and sure, millennial) consumers care about. i know "men in tech" may not care about this, but plenty of women *do* and there's a lot of us here!

2. start ups! tell us which startups are hitting milestones, getting funding, growing exponentially — and tell us whether you think they are worthwhile businesses or not.

3. data-centric information about technology, the economy, psychology, and everyday life. i love seeing data visualizations behind things that we know and love.

4. more SCIENCE! tell us how pigs could solve the organ donor crisis or why sunshine is good for the immune system. anything!

what do you want to read more of here?

Ted: “ok you guys, let’s stop talking about Farcaster on Farcaster — new users think it’s weird” 

Everyone, last week: “bet”

Everyone, this week: *posts leaderboard screenshot every 2 hours to engagement farm*

friendly neighborhood shitcaster // working on @pinetree

the problem is every crypto twitter big dawg that gets nerdsniped by farcaster (even if just for a week or two) literally just wants to talk about the thing that nerdsniped them 

it’s their new toy and our new toy is their temporary fascination with our told toy

no way to acquire new nerds without gettin nerdtalk

weird internet kid. word rotator. yapping on /okbanger. playing with @wannanaplabs. curating in /cameron | dev + vet + HBS. 
Cameronarmstrong.org 🫡

I think you’re right about the segregated feeds, and that seems to be what’s happening 

I just don’t think the degen growth strat leads to quality growth — people who come for money are mercenaries. You can extract swap fees from them, but you’re not going to build civil society 

And speaking as a non gambling mini app dev, I need more “normal” users to grow and for creators to have a big enough audience to monetize well. The gamblers don’t care about good content

Yea I agree in the general case but in our specific farcaster case we have a long tail deconfliction problem

Crypto long tail cares first about free internet money and then accidentally gets entertained/may stick around for the memes + vibes 

Normal long tail just wants memes and jokes and content

Crypto long tail will listen to whatever boring shit the CT big dawgs will say bc they think it might reveal alpha or a shitcoin or w/e 

So all the normie signal is blurred by the arguably more incentivized CT long tail class 

I don’t think there is a clean GTM that lets you acquire both bc as you pointed out they are fundamentally at odds. 

Best idea I have is further siloing the feed and basically engineering a “crypto farcaster algo” and a “non crypto farcaster algo” to separate the cultures but I think that’s unfortunately worst of both worlds strategy

My guess is merkle continued full bore money audience a la coinbase forced growth and gambling games or they shut down in <2 years

Long term, i think we need to make mini apps that give a real reason for communities to hang out more. Combo that with revitalized channels thst looks closer to discord with some public feed connected components and we might have a chance at being a permanent place on the internet e

Great articulation 

I think onboarding the crypto nerd cohort with fancy money toys is at odds with acquiring GA users who don’t care about the nerdy stuff (hence Ted’s feedback)

It’s like a conflicted GTM — do you want to niche down or scale?