Jacek.degen.eth đ©
@jacek
GM Degens, Curious to hear your thoughts on a potential $DEGEN burn. The foundation currently holds 32.5% of the supply. While we could use it for future airdrops (like for the Degen app or other ideas), that would dilute current holders, which doesnât feel right for those whoâve been hodling. Weâll always need some $DEGEN to keep building, but probably not 30%+. And letâs be honest, that big supply has scared off some new users worried about future inflation. One idea: a phased burn đ„. Steadily burn tokens monthly until we reach a sustainable amount for years of building, while rewarding long-term holders. We wouldnât burn everything, but it would shift tokenomics, and likely remove any big airdrops down the line. What do you think: burn or distribute more to the community?
89 replies
34 recasts
241 reactions
BrixBountyFarm đ©
@brixbounty
Donât burn it Imo burn on well established tokens reek of desperation Agree with @zinger on this one If youâve moved from meme to âproject coinâ your tied to folks wanting to hold the token cause of what youâre building & shipping. Feel free to slow emissions though https://farcaster.xyz/zinger/0xfdb7e0bd
3 replies
2 recasts
16 reactions
BrixBountyFarm đ©
@brixbounty
@alemac Iâll take the counter to your take.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Treborđ©đĄ
@trebor69
This is also very true unfortunately. It did work nicely for BNB tho.. when binance did it periodically it worked
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
dusan
@ds8
> Imo burn on well established tokens reek of desperation absolutely, 500 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
