androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
As order deteriorates, power will become the "law of the land" -- s/he who wields it is right regardless of what the law says on paper That's why it's so important rn to be building tech that throttles the power any one person / company can wield. Higher floors (more sovereignty) and lower ceilings (fewer sovereigns)
7 replies
1 recast
32 reactions
Nicholas
@nintynick.eth
how are you feeling about DAOs these days?
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Still too dysfunctional in their idealized form I think A is not needed yet other than onchain money — the D and O are slowly starting to happen Onchain coordination holy grail is good corporate governance imo
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Boiler(Chris)
@boiler
Define A Autonomous = Auto or Autonomous = Sovereignty Or Both at the same time This is a question DAO people have been asking for years. In any case, I think it is a vital part of a DAO. In order for a DAO to operate “legally” there needs to be provable decentralization and that comes from what is done without human intervention. The A. Without it, it’s not a DAO, just an onchain/internet org, like say Farcaster.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Boiler(Chris)
@boiler
I agree you can’t set it and forget it, I don’t think that’s the point, unless we just want AI DAOs. There are some things though, like streaming rewards/compensation, automatic execution of voting etc. Metalex has some interesting ideas around cybernetic organizations that is pretty interesting.Check them out if you haven’t yet.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
I think "autonomous" was originally meant to mean programmatic, not sovereign (though one could argue that programmatic rulesets are a pre-req) I just meant the tools aren't sophisticated enough to set it and forget it -- humans are very much still needed in the loop And I agree, many onchain orgs larp as DAOs because the word stuck
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction