Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Bitfloorsghost pfp
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
I like the idea generally and will have to consider it, but for a couple of things - I'm not totally sold on the leaderboard algo as it currently is and don't really want to subsidize that - many of the people at the top of the leaderboard I don't know of and/or interact with - I don't want my money to support builders who actively look down on my people (replyguys) - It'd be nice to be able to have more say in where your subscription fees specifically go (see above - I'd like to prioritize my money going towards replyguys more than "builders") If we were able to be a bit more intentional with where our specific subscription fees go (instead of a general fund) I'd be more excited for the idea, I don't think it's bad on its face
8 replies
4 recasts
23 reactions

Ramsey  🎩🤝 pfp
Ramsey 🎩🤝
@ramsey
you can always enable @tipn for replyguys
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Koolkheart pfp
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
The intent behind it is solid, but if the impact ends up being gatekept by leaderboard clout, that’s a real problem. Especially when the actual vibe-makers get sidelined
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Msh🎩 pfp
Msh🎩
@msh
That's good way
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ETHN pfp
ETHN
@ethn
Leaderboard algo definitely needs to be changed, it’s such a strange system imo
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mikasa🦋🖤 pfp
Mikasa🦋🖤
@ayeeshaxoxo
Reply guys are basically the building blocks.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

baeshy🎩 pfp
baeshy🎩
@baeshy.eth
preach!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction