Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
BrightFutureGuy 🎩↑
@bfg
Big caveats for me - after all I’ve seen web2/web3 - yes, it’s at the beginning for the founders and teams that don’t actually need $$ to deliver their plan (and they have distribution magic covered) If you’re in dire need of cash to make whatever you’re planning - it is 99% certainty folks will end up feeling rugged because you’ll fail to deliver what you imagined (which btw is normal) and your comms and distribution will get gradually worse as money runs out
4 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Maxximillian.base.eth
@maxximillian
The public isn’t usually in possession of the facts surrounding the actual personal finances of any founder, therefore aren’t ’going to feel in danger of being rugged’ unless the project folk do something ‘ruggy’. Curious… Why do you say founders and teams don’t need $$$ to deliver at the beginning? I find it difficult to form a team without paying people. Ppl have bills. A paid dedicated team has a better chance to get things done, IMO. Even if it’s short term: we are shipping this in 6 weeks, whatever. That money at the start can make a huge helpful difference. Passion alone doesn’t keep the lights on. Time spent earning money to keep the lights on could be better spent redirected toward the project - I am a huge supporter of early funding for projects.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Maxximillian.base.eth
@maxximillian
99 percent chance … something we don’t want - nope. Not buying into that. Why are you talking this way? Where is the truth to what you’re saying? About anyone and everyone? Dial it in, fren.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Maxximillian.base.eth
@maxximillian
Where are you getting these awful stats? Sounds unverifiable and pretty bleak.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
matthew
@matthew
yeah I can see that, does not sound fun
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
