bence
@bence
reviews have to be the least coherent part of any ux at this point 1. you can’t verify authenticity no one really knows how legit the contents and motives of reviews are anymore i’m bullish on world for this reason: you can of course verify they’re written by humans. you could also theoretically have better visibility into the flow of capital to and from accounts (wallets), which could be used to check authenticity claims from influencers 2. you don’t see range everything’s roughly a 4.5 now. if everything’s great, nothing is. effectively nullifies the value of reviews as a consumer navigation tool we need to have higher standards and call out when something is subpar or average
4 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Hand Of Gold 🎤🗣️🚀⚽
@thatweb3guy
Do you think reddit solved for this with the upvote and downvote mechanism. Community then begin to curate what they believe is authentic
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bence
@bence
funny you mention it, just the other day ran into this problem on reddit some guy made an entire account just to shill a product i don’t think upvotes long-term it solve the issue
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hand Of Gold 🎤🗣️🚀⚽
@thatweb3guy
I feel with upvote as a form of curation, community amplify what resonates with them, and what they consider noice Designing a content reward game using this mechanism. I feel with this mechanism and reward attached, creators are then forced to distribute insights that are relevant to the network. Imagine you being able to upvote or downvote content on farcaster and it reflects on the position of the creator on the leaderboard
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction