Philosophy

Fun philosophical experiment: should you kill the fat man?

Got an 83% consistency score on this, very interested in other people's scores here

Fun philosophical experiment: should you kill the fat man?

Got an 83% consistency score on this, very interested in other people's scores here
https://www.philosophyexperiments.com/fatman/

co-founder @ponder @survey // benadamsky.com

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

I expected a 100% consistency score from you tbh

don't know if i'm moral, but i'm consistent... which i'm not sure tells me anything as the scenarios are very close to 50:50 and i can't say for certain if my decisions would've been the same if they were "real"

fortune cookie casts, memes, parenting, building mini apps, /framedl, /framedl-pro & /calmer

I don’t know if anyone would stick to their morals if these were irl scenarios

This fails to factor in emotions and adrenaline which would probably alter decisions for sure

83% as well. Need to revisit my blanket opposition to torture.

Tricks with polynomials and Riemann-Roch spaces. Breaking into the platonic realm to pillage forbidden abstractions. Starknet grantee.

I had a similar inconsistency where I voted torture is always wrong and then opted to torture the fat man to save 1 million people

My big inconsistency was on the third question where I voted killing is always wrong if it can be avoided

First question I opted to kill one person to save five, instant moral dilemma

Definitely pretty interesting. I got a 100%.

Frog | FID #3741 | Bitcoin | Nerd | Accelerate

cloaks.app

Not 100% bc in the last case i’d torture him myself