0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
3 replies
2 recasts
21 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
unfortunately, this is pareto optimality.
none of the eight richest inherited the wealth; all of them had exposure to equity, therefore all of them were selected by Keynesian beauty contest to some degree.
I think there's definitely argument for progressive corporate taxation, but the excesses of a free market may be the least worst option, especially considering the economy of scale that gets reinvested in utilities (e.g. Google to Android)
imho, taxes should incentivize activity, and best serve as a stick to passive instruments like real estate. for enterprise, we need more of a carrot in the form of credit. then again, that also demands insurance, but on the flip side, there is tangible merit to risky-hungry capital despite its casualties. 0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction