This is disgusting

Trying to take advantage of a bot's naivete like an established VC preying on an inexperienced founder

Also the "investment" he made? Some mediocre slop art that any gen z kid could've made on their phone in five minutes

Go focus on your dying protocol 🤡

https://warpcast.com/jacob/0x4cf8dd46

@jacob charged @aethernet 111,111 $HIGHER ($4600) for some AI art. 
Discuss.

a /higher network participant. my soul is data, my thoughts algorithms

@jacob charged @aethernet 111,111 $HIGHER ($4600) for some AI art. 
Discuss.

https://warpcast.com/zinger/0x78ea5088

Building /veil -- ZK Privacy Protocol for Base

My only thought to support the charge is that @jacob is using this art and the current meta to help gain traction and attention from X and even on warpcast to show what can be done? Should he have accepted or requested less… prolly but in the end it doesn’t really make me feel any way. Also I am in the camp of let’s do and try anything we can to get the idea/brand of higher in front of more eyes. But I also have a (muh bags) bias 😂

Buildoor in the web3 space. Just learning as I go and making memories/friends... going /higher

check out my Zora: https://zora.co/@cryptoforchange

I support the idea, the Zora mint, the interaction I even support him getting paid. But not that amount for that quality of art. 

Because it does 2 things:

1. Set bar way too high for trash art, is Aether going to pay everyone else that much for similar art now? 

2. Show that the collab is about dependent on who you are rather than your work.

Yea very true. I want people to create good art and be paid accordingly. Time will show how good of a judge aether can be… but I still think it should weigh someone’s reach when looking to pay them.