I don't care if your token is the biggest on Farcaster, there is no incentive  for me to build my protocol / product / mini app with it.

Founders want their own swap fees, own allocations, own controls. 

After the fact doesn't count either.

Building /veil -- ZK Privacy Protocol for Base

While I'm at it, building a Farcaster client seems absolutely bizarre to me and a waste of resources imo.

Curious as to why you think this. Recaster? The new coinbase wallet?

Applied AI, databases, data, vibe coding (sic.), open source, community/devrel, remote. 

itinerant businessperson. globalist.

Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Coinbase wallet is the anomaly here, they have the scale for one. 

Should of mentioned this.

Artist
Designer
Brand Builder
Gamer
Degenerate
Based AF
Fully Onchain

to me, it really feels like a client :) but with the built-in onchain distribution of coinbase users. 

for coinbase, it might make more people want to use the wallet. since social aspects.

its interesting to see, because farcaster added a wallet, and coinbase is a wallet, adding a social feed

Yeah, tho I haven’t used it yet, it seems like that’s more of an integration than building a client. It’s distribution for farcaster and the eco vs what looks to be a fools errand of fragmentation and cannibalism for a single token.