Virtual Protocol

Curious why @virtualsprotocol.eth isn’t active on @farcaster 
 Both are top players on @base 
 
Would love to see them intersect. Seems like a win-win : more traffic, more YAP, more fun.
cc @dwr.eth @ethermage

A sufficiently decentralized social network. farcaster.xyz

Onchain @base, coordinating AI agents to bring infinite content & replayability to games, leveraging blockchain for parallel hyper-synchronicity & co-ownership

Artist Father & Dog dad to Jungle 
 /anemale /symbolic-citees 
https://foundation.app/mint/eth/0x9157eBC552B90547d75eC96b2C420cDF62e39A08

ex-/airswap. part time node runner, full time shitcaster, all time higher

yeah. a lot of people here also cross post anyway, but X is like 100x bigger audience

I saw based whales stop casting here and go to X with moooooooore visibility

+1. base eco is split into CT and FC now. most camps depending on where their bags lie

Wee Kee, the co-founder of Virtuals Protocol, answered this question in a podcast interview — “There’s zero reason to build there. Like, there is no traffic”. (at 15:42). I wonder if he would have a different answer now.

crypto-anarchist · onchain social explorer, advisor · spread FC gospel in /chinese community · curate SocialSight.telegram· write 0xluo.xyz · host /luo ·中文 @luo

First, Farcaster isn’t built on Base, the registration data is actually on OP. Meanwhile, miniapps now support multiple major chains including ETH, Base, OP, Arbitrum, and newer additions like Monad and Celo.

That said, Farcaster is often associated with Base, likely because of their close relationship, and many Base devs are active here.

Still, many projects on Base continue to focus solely on Twitter, skipping Farcaster. The likely reason is what Wee Kee pointed out: fewer users mean lower traffic, and the ROI of building or operating here doesn’t seem high.

From this angle, if Farcaster had more users and higher DAU, it might attract more devs. But the opposite is also true: only when more devs build here will more users come. That’s what Farcaster is trying to do, onboard more chains, attract more devs, and showcase what can happen when Farcaster social graph + Warplet + miniapps.

But someone has to benefit first to prove the value. It’s still early, and it takes time.

Thank you so much for your response, I’ll listen to it tonight. I’m definitely not an expert, quite the opposite actually, I know nothing about all this.

But it does raise some questions for me: if a Web3-native platform like Farcaster, built on Base, isn’t able to attract the biggest protocol project on Base like Virtual, isn’t that a real problem ?

What I find a bit unfortunate is that Farcaster is betting on smart, interesting builders… and from what I see, it’s exactly the same on Virtual’s side, right?

Maybe I’m wrong, like I said, I’m no expert. But if you have any thoughts on this, I’d love to hear them

Wee Kee, the co-founder of Virtuals Protocol, answered this question in a podcast interview — “There’s zero reason to build there. Like, there is no traffic”. (at 15:42). I wonder if he would have a different answer now.

https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/episode/678ca2818d7ef7b6b04f2cd9