imo entirely dependent on qualification for the airdrops

discriminating against those who hold / sell airdrops is not the way, you shouldn't have the choice

fix the qualification process to mitigate the problem

we trade open markets

The mythical user that only wants airdrops to use as in-app utility tokens doesn’t exist

Tokens are exciting bc you can trade them. Traders being punished / excluded from future airdrops for selling is a weird dynamic

@jake has had the best messaging here. He constantly tells $QR holders to sell and risk off if they want to

friendly neighborhood shitcaster // working on @pinetree

The non-mythical user that that only wants airdrops to sell are plentiful though. So if a developer airdrops to one million+ FIDs 99% will sell immediately destroying the chart. What's the solution?

Normie truned into degen in FC | I'm mostly JK | Host /venting /burrfrens | mod /impact /byegary

Build a real product that doesn't require finding bagholders?

Achieves a number of things:

1. Vision is Bracky spin up a prediction market about anything - this requires a lot of liquidity provision.

2. Our treasury of $bracky is how we let anyone on FC/X/Telegram start betting for free, in-feed, with no onboarding. (think of Draft Kings spending $200 CAC)

3. Aligns incentives w community.

4. Trading fees as revenue stream for team, less dependent on outside funding.

I like Bracket a lot but I still don't understand why the product needs $bracky -- why couldn't it just use ETH or USDC?

Is this a midcurve take? cc @tldr

Well $bracky and $dev were the two best ones for me. I didn't sell them I used them to test the developers product and then bought more of both because I was interested. I only tested because I received an airdrop. Now had they airdroped to every FID these tokens would have dumped into nothing.