How do you guys decide to use the FC app vs TBA?

The features are very similar so trying to figure out how to logically split my usage 

Fine if it’s just vibes or whatever but would be cool to have separation of concerns

TBA is very well-built, but it mostly cannibalizes my existing FC usage — and some features like DCs, dev tools and channels require that I keep using FC

So what use cases will TBA specialize in that net grows my usage? Or are existing FC users not the target audience?

Trying to reason about how to use these 2 apps

friendly neighborhood shitcaster // working on @pinetree

similar experience. my current mental model:
right now FC power users are testing out TBA as an alt client. but over time there should be a divergence in user persona of FC app and TBA? 

CB/TBA caters to existing/new wallet users (going from wallet -->social)
FC app caters to social first users (going from social --> wallet)

If the only difference is GTM sequencing, then it’s unclear how the apps don’t end up going after the same small TAM at the intersection of crypto social / wallet 

Which means we end up with the same feature sets too?

Ya that makes sense, but to @kia.eth s point, both seem to be focused on the wallet right now

agreed! everyone's realizing wallets are the business model once u get decent installs/dau.  
https://farcaster.xyz/sahil/0x9aaaf1f8

think the bet is for tba to grow the TAM outside of current crypto social/wallet category - basically onboard anyone who holds crypto, CEX users, etc. 

tba feature set might be more oriented towards everything onchain (txn surface) - memcoins, creator coins, music coins, community coins?

not sure how the overlap of fc and tba will play out :)