Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/consumercrypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
(old) interesting thread from @shef-curry. doing my best to summarieze and sharing my own POV below: content layer of internet has no value, esp when cost of producing content trends to zero aggregation layer of internet has all the value, eg curation whether done manually or by algo crypto social platforms should focus on aggregation and *not* content generation what does this mean? allow anyone to create a custom feed X kind of does this with "lists" but always chronological ## 1. agree on value of curation: there's rising demand for feeds to be an extension of personal taste. 2. evidence: bluesky's custom feed system is mostly built by 3rd parties and reddit shows that aggregation / curation can be crowd-driven and sticky. 3. challenge: incumbents won't do it, new platforms have cold start problem, UX is still too complex for the avg person, + technical complexity is HARD. 4. opportunity: imo syndication + curation is the real play here. https://x.com/ShivanshuMadan/status/1920524122289025488
7 replies
1 recast
24 reactions
Mehdi Benembarek
@mehdi-benembarek
@abundance has an interesting approach for curation with /impact Saying that, producing quality content doesn’t cost close to 0 … involves different people, expertise, fixed and variable costs etc … Then the question would be how can we find an equilibrium between meme / casino / fun crypto vibes and valued quality
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mike | Abundance 🌟
@abundance
with Impact the curation has value because the content has value the community believes that curators proactively surfacing valuable content are adding value, and they want to reward both the creators & curators bc the content actually contributes to the community
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
