people, artists especially, don’t like the word ‘content’ at all so the whole thing already starts with a non zero level of ick from the name alone. maybe it doesn’t matter that much but I would drop the content thing from future copy

icebreaker.xyz/0xen |
https://gallery.so/Oxen/galleries | https://opensea.io/collection/farcats

maybe there’s not a better name that’s easy so it just has to be content coin, like I mentioned earlier somewhere that was the nice thing about ‘nft’ it abstracted away the term ‘token’ - just ‘coin’ is fine tho

Pi-chi.eth Artist /animeoutcasts
Hosting: /sakura /kyoto /anime-manga /farcasterunion

https://portrait.so/pichi

I think it’s fine that this meta isn’t for everybody, wish NFTs got a little more respect these days but that’s just how the market is

I don’t like this whole arc. I can’t be responsible for coins when I want to make art. I can play and test, but I don’t know how much I can lean into this meta.

Don’t worry I’ve been calling them “zoins” which is by far the worst naming convention. 

Makes me feel like this like I’m in some weird cult. 🫠

I dunno, maybe it’s fine. I prefer NFTs partly because the name. Even though ‘token’ is in there it’s abstracted away

I agree with this, as soon as content is mentioned by a platform, I am subconsciously tuning out because I already feel that it’s not applying to the art market