@nickysap
Antigravity is decent as an agent interface. Less so as a code editor.
Some initial thoughts:
- Gemini 3 is better at frontend than Claude Code (perhaps even v0).
- The Agent Manager offers a more visually-guided way to manage multiple conversations and workspaces (read: directories) than Claude Code. For a certain type of user, that is powerful.
- Rather than creating excessive .md files, the agent offers a "Walkthrough" in planning mode. This is a nice touch that gives you a pre- and post-implementation overview of what's happening.
- Playground mode is interesting. Normally I would just create a new git branch, but this offers a low-stakes path to validating an idea before bringing it into the workspace context.
- Splitting the Agent Manager out from the editor as a separate window is a choice I'm unsure about. While it provides more visual context to your workflow and offers more capability, it's another window to juggle.
- The in-editor agentic browser testing does help mitigate some of the excessive juggling we usually do while testing.
Overall, I can see why Google is framing this as a tool for less-technical builders. The corporate marketing and the shills they've hired are mostly painting this as a "build anything you can think of" tool for vibe coders.
I don't see myself using this as a daily driver but I'll take the free Gemini 3 inference while it lasts, knock out some nagging frontend tasks from the backlog, and keep my eye out for improvements.