@m-j-r.eth
if it wasn't clear before the IPO & Fable lockdown, currency is no longer welfare. fundraising is for political privilege, and we're not watching massive celebration of debt for autonomy. there is a clear moral contest over equity, over possessing natural right to own as much land, raise as much of an army, etc. a trillionaire is manifesting not because there is a trillion-dollar object to be flipped, but a commuter toll of a lifetime.
wrt Anthropic/Fable, messing around with rhetoric and finance until USG intervenes is as positional and purposeful as SBF's attempt to outcompete CZ. considering conversations in 2023-4, there's been an explicit goal of depriving public of such means of information and persuasion, basically a coordinated bloc of debtors accusing their creditors of moral inferiority rather than concede repossession. Blue skies research is the opposite, an amoral inquiry of effective control, and we even moralize these creditors as angels to material progress.
takeaway for me is that the former clearly assembled a moral movement, while the latter is juggling the lesser of evils for moral stasis. the stakes are higher & offline, so favors will be more consequential, as much as shakedowns for the privilege, but at a certain point of paper wealth the only drive is strategically divesting it for uncontested moral position (i.e. being left alone at the top), which becomes more valuable than ever.
if there's more opensource diffusion, all the more resilient moral upside at cost of asymmetric position, all the more moderate circumstance for innovative debt, and the casino booms.
any further moral brinksmanship will mint more trillionaires who never spend a trillion. people will never stop aspiring to be left alone at the top, which means all the more thrill for everyone else.