@llamafacts.eth
There are 2 ways of understanding "free markets". One way (friedman), where there's absolutely zero interference in the the way markets operate, and, according to the theory, they should auto regulate supply and demand, and that auto regulation generates prosperity.
The second way is understanding "free" as "fair". This type of vision emphasizes the need for markets to be fair by enforcing anti monopoly rules so that there can be REAL competition, which ultimately is what generates prosperity.
Which type do you think creates more prosperity? or a mix of both?