Join /aichannel https://cura.network/aichannel/details?a

2 replies

1 recast

29 reactions

Dastardly AI activity here.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Wait, why was there even a trial when the statute of limitations had passed?

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Something I noticed trying out ChatGPT x Codex over Claude Code, is there's still a heavy degree of separation between "ChatGPT" and "Codex", and sometimes I want to talk to ChatGPT, and pick up that conversation or thread inside of Codex but it's not setup to work that way.

2 replies

0 recast

9 reactions

Daily AI users view AI very differently from non-users. Daily users: 77% favourable / 20% unfavourable Rare or never-users: 25% favourable / 67% unfavourable That is a 99-point net opinion gap larger than the divide by party, age, gender, education or race. Overall, U.S. voters are almost evenly split: 48% favourable, 46% unfavourable. The poll cannot prove causation: using AI may make people like it more, or people already open to AI may use it more. But the central finding is clear: experience with AI is the biggest divide in public opinion. Source: https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2026/2/27/public-opinion-on-artificial-intelligence-varies-widely-by-age-gender-race-and-frequency-of-use

3 replies

0 recast

6 reactions

Builders vs. people living with it, AI edition, via Pew Research. Spoiler alert, builders are more optimistic and the genpop do not trust this https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/04/pi_2025.04.03_us-public-and-ai-experts_report.pdf

1 reply

0 recast

6 reactions

"To build intuition: suppose you walk past a geyser, and see a sign saying "This geyser last erupted 100,000 years ago". You know nothing else about geysers. What's the chance it will erupt in the next hour? It must be very low, right? If it erupted in the next hour, you would have walked past it 99.99999% of the way through its eruption cycle - in other words, your random sample had a higher value than 99.99999% of points. That's not how random samples usually work! On the other hand, suppose you walk past another geyser, and see a sign saying "This geyser last erupted 10 minutes ago". What is the chance that this geyser will erupt in the next hour? Pretty high, right? It seems like this geyser's eruptions occur on a scale of every few minutes. When you calculate it out, your median prediction for the length of time until the next eruption should just be the number on the sign. In the same way, your median prediction for how long it should take before an entirely-mysterious trend changes shape should be the amount of time since the last change." The Sigmoids Won't Save You https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/the-sigmoids-wont-save-you

1 reply

0 recast

7 reactions

Who has a prediction for how this Musk vs Altman case will resolve? And what do you think the aftermath will be for the AI industry?

2 replies

0 recast

6 reactions

“Channel 4 News approached Grok and Gemini for a comment but they didn't respond.” https://x.com/channel4news/status/2054914259360924130?s=46

2 replies

0 recast

6 reactions

Comrade clankers https://www.wired.com/story/overworked-ai-agents-turn-marxist-study/

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

The Rust team is looking for feedback on LLM use. Good amount of prior art to watch as well. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-forge/pull/1040

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

This guy just recovered 5 BTC from a wallet that was locked 11 years ago ha

0 reply

0 recast

6 reactions

Claude just automated lawyers. Claude for Legal is LIVE now, and it's crazy. https://github.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal Unlock agents, plug-ins, and much more with this GitHub repo. Claude is coming for EVERY industry.

0 reply

1 recast

7 reactions

Anthropic has passed OpenAI in business adoption for the first time: https://ramp.com/leading-indicators/ai-index-may-2026

1 reply

0 recast

7 reactions

https://x.com/krea_ai/status/2054611917365526793?s=20

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction