keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
USA #1 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ โ€œBy December 2024, AI wrote an estimated 30.1% of Python functions from U.S. contributors, versus 24.3% in Germany, 23.2% in France, 21.6% in India, 15.4% in Russia and 11.7% in China. Newer GitHub users use AI more than veterans, while male and female developers adopt at similar rates.โ€ https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.08945
3 replies
1 recast
17 reactions

zoo pfp
zoo
@zoo
you seen this? accelerilio https://x.com/itsalexvacca/status/1935343874421178762?s=46&t=Il5NrMeCjY0zjgXBkcDWtA
6 replies
1 recast
6 reactions

zoo pfp
zoo
@zoo
"like technical debt, but for your brain" ๐Ÿ™‚โ€โ†•๏ธ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Topocount pfp
Topocount
@topocount.eth
I think AI-assisted coding can fall into this trap, but it doesn't have to. If you're using it to do tedious work while working on other things, or using it to find starting points for various tasks, it can act as an accelerator without sacrificing the chance to engage with what's actually happening.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
Magnificent! Enfeeblement is the constant shadow for every technical level we've added to the human toolkit.... Thanks for this paper - super interested in all this. Related ideas coming out of this interview (and book) which I just cottoned on to: https://youtu.be/35r0iSajXjA?si=qsXooes2MK6Apgb1
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Nick Smith pfp
Nick Smith
@iamnick.eth
this is v interesting
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
counter-point i was already mentally bankrupt ai isnt to blame
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

ruburi pfp
ruburi
@ruburi
when soulless code?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions