zinger

Kinda want to explore some way to mark accounts that are engagement farming (community consensus) to easily exclude them from future projects (and airdrops)

/new-york 🗽 • /untzuntz 😈 • /tastebuds 🍕 Fan of eating tacos and bringing people together, often at the same time 🌮

Do it with an alt unless you like paranoid randos mentioning you asking you why they’re shadow banned.

Founder of /fcny - 50+ IRL events for Farcaster's builder ecosystem | Systems + community strategy

Silly is good, if not great.

In my book engagement farming is

“Like/reply/follow for (transactional action)” if even it’s just a reciprocal like/reply/follow.

I’m sure you’re totally fine from that definition.

I am worried that I may look like I’m engagement farming now that I’m posting more silly content 🥲

/***** offline; reach out elsewhere *****/

possible through neynar’s api. @fun your next feature is managing muted users

I’ll just send you my muted accounts list (if Warpcast could let me see them)

Founding Engineer @ The Network School

Instagram - @jacobcomputer

Seems like a cast action is a good way to submit the data but displaying it would still require an external client

time to put them on the ‘not invited to the party’ list. let’s keep it real

I was thinking about this the other day, seems really complicated to find a way. Especially if the conversions and links are being exchanged in other apps.