so the $wickr launch failed on virtuals.

i’m considering:
- relaunching on virtuals with updated tokenomics: burn 30% of supply, vest remaining 20% over 12 months with 3-6 month lock
- launching on sol with launchcoin

what do you guys think? feedback appreciated.

https://wickr.fun/ @wickr | https://coinberg.xyz/ | https://castcoins.xyz/ @castcoins | /degen-lotto https://degenlotto.fun/ | /co /farcastles

what was the biggest pushback by the community on the first launch?

thanks for sharing.

it sounds to me that the virtuals community indeed cares, does their research and is skeptical in a good way

pretty much every aspect lol

team is anon: my twitter got suspended a few months ago. started a new one like 10 days ago, only 100 followers. so no trust. also there was a bug on the project page. it showed zero team members. literally empty.

why token: didn’t communicate this well. people asked why wickr needs a token if the platform is free. should’ve made it clear it’s not a utility token. more like a way to support the project and keep it free for all.

bad tokenomics: first release was 9 days after tge. was planning an airdrop with 1% of supply to increase reach, but that probably scared people off. should’ve done 6 month locks to make it super clear idgaf about tokens. just let people farm points by holding.

also:
snowball fud: one big “research” account fudded, then point farmers piled on with copy-pasta posts. that hurt a lot i guess.

bad timing: launched between two very hyped projects.

early release: probably should’ve waited a bit to build followers and get some traction first.