so the $wickr launch failed on virtuals.

i’m considering:
- relaunching on virtuals with updated tokenomics: burn 30% of supply, vest remaining 20% over 12 months with 3-6 month lock
- launching on sol with launchcoin

what do you guys think? feedback appreciated.

https://wickr.fun/ @wickr | https://coinberg.xyz/ | https://castcoins.xyz/ @castcoins | /degen-lotto https://degenlotto.fun/ | /co /farcastles

yes, a few guys mentioned it. i guess the more you hold, the more points you get. they were worried about the first unlock time. i was thinking of running an airdrop campaign after launch, with a 1% unlock 10 days after tge. probably scared some people.

the goal is to earn from fees while keeping the platform free. so more trading volume means better for $wickr. sol has a solid track record for volume, and launchcoin seems to have the most attention rn. tbh i don't know any other launchpads on sol apart from pump.

sorry king. have people given feedback about tokenomics being bad? prob better to move to launchcoin anyway, more hype and eyeballs atm

Crypto & web3 enthusiast, an experienced #FPL manager and wine enjoyer.

I go where the chain takes me. ⛓️

yeah, that was the ugliest bug i’ve seen. added myself as dev, but it didn’t show on the project page.

you seem like you’re in the virtuals game. in the coming days, which days are good for a launch? or which should be avoided due to hyped projects?

relaunching on virtuals might be a good idea. it is where the hype is. I saw some $wickr comments about "unknown dev/team", so maybe adress that to an extent. updating tokenomics is smart too, the trend seems to be locking tokens for a longer period.

pretty much every aspect lol

team is anon: my twitter got suspended a few months ago. started a new one like 10 days ago, only 100 followers. so no trust. also there was a bug on the project page. it showed zero team members. literally empty.

why token: didn’t communicate this well. people asked why wickr needs a token if the platform is free. should’ve made it clear it’s not a utility token. more like a way to support the project and keep it free for all.

bad tokenomics: first release was 9 days after tge. was planning an airdrop with 1% of supply to increase reach, but that probably scared people off. should’ve done 6 month locks to make it super clear idgaf about tokens. just let people farm points by holding.

also:
snowball fud: one big “research” account fudded, then point farmers piled on with copy-pasta posts. that hurt a lot i guess.

bad timing: launched between two very hyped projects.

early release: probably should’ve waited a bit to build followers and get some traction first.

what was the biggest pushback by the community on the first launch?

Inspiring my fellow degens,
one story at a time

checked the platform but there seems to be no volume

Thanks bro! I commented in your earlier cast, maybe you can also consider launching on Flaunch? not very popular now, but the caliber of you as a dev + the mechanics of  Fair launch on Flaunch is I think a game changer

Lmk if you prefer to do an inaugural launch on Circus. Jestr won’t have enough configuration for you but we could white glove a Circus configuration for you. 

DMs open

I tried putting in my virtuals token and fhe commit button wouldn't light up

I know of a new token launcher on base coming soon with lots of dev features 
@forg

Sol is a good idea, more liquidity there and Hopefully by then i have enough virgin points to join!