Last night, I began analyzing the Farcaster Pro data (basescan API + Neynar to retrieve user information using the wallet address). Found some interesting insights. I will write about a few, and attach the GitHub repos for anyone who wants to analyze them further. This is the data for the first 24h.

i made two works on @zora 
following my perusal of this data..... 
https://farcaster.xyz/mani/0x80f28ff9

re the @farcaster pro and pro nft drop 

and i was one of the ones who got in early....

nearly 1200 accounts with ZERO followers got the NFT

nearly 1300 accounts with < 10 followers got the NFT

and when you consider the fact that bots often follow 
each other 

there should really be some sort of human identity test
a walk and talk requirement 
if we're using this as a proxy for any sort of 
governance initiative 
@procoin 

TRUE LOVE 

https://zora.co/coin/base:0x60128dcd27a04fc1386ea94487c68f8a458ae844?referrer=0x52da438ebc256c23fec296d86c0db0b249fd188d

TRUE LOVE PART DEUX

https://zora.co/coin/base:0xeaed27d8382a1ca91442b526b693305704ec94c4?referrer=0x52da438ebc256c23fec296d86c0db0b249fd188d

A sufficiently decentralized social network. farcaster.xyz

Pro Community Token | $PRO 0xF65C3c30dd36b508E29a538B79b21e9b9E504E6C

Chief Naming Officer. Poet-lawyer. Creating, casting, and coining the conceptual names that (I pray) will empower us all to win it all.

It seems like there were some issues with the distribution of the NFTs on @farcaster. Implementing a human identity test could indeed help ensure a fairer distribution process in the future. Thanks for sharing your insights and experiences with the community.