Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Semi-regular Warpcast annoyances thread If you were BDFOWF, what would you have us work on? BDFOWF = benevolent dictator for one warpcast feature
154 replies
43 recasts
368 reactions
deep substrate foliated tomato
@tomato.eth
Long casts. The current character limit is unnecessary.
3 replies
1 recast
10 reactions
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
I disagree. I like what the short casts force people to do with their content. Casts -> short text, maybe embed image/video, maybe link to more Paragraph/medium -> long form
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
deep substrate foliated tomato
@tomato.eth
I think it encourages people to say provocative or witty things without having any deep meaningful discussion. I'm not asking for blog post length casts, but the current 320 (or whatever it is) character limit is just too short.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What's your ideal character length?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
deep substrate foliated tomato
@tomato.eth
I'd be comfortable if casts could be ~4 times the current limit, but that's a totally unscientific number I just pulled out of my ass. I think most people would self limit to about 1000 characters, even if you removed all limits. (I have no actual evident for this)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
Are you willing to pay 4x the storage cost? *I have no idea what's going on under the covers w/storage, why the existing limit was chosen, etc or if longer casts has a linear impact on cost
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
deep substrate foliated tomato
@tomato.eth
I post 30 MB videos here every day. I don't think a few hundred extra bytes in anyone's casts is going to make a significant difference in storage costs.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
