borodutch

My 2c on Airdrop-Selling drama:

+ I worked with Merkle on an Airdrop. They didn't impose their criteria on us, they helped us to set *our* critieria.

+ Therefore, I think many people are mistakingly taking Dan's comment as a threat "from Dan" when, in fact, it is his observation of what Airdrop Teams will decide for their self-interest.

+ And I'd say Dan's point is directionally correct – giving airdrops that seem likely to be insta-sold is less appealing to Teams than the opposite.

+ However, selling does *not* have to overwhelm all other criteria. Eg, if someone is a power-user of many apps and tokens like @tricil.eth, this may be more important to a Team than whether he sold a drop or not.

tldr: Dan's point clearly has merit, but Airdrop Criteria is a unique decision made by each Team (not by Merkle!)

i'm one of the developers that is doing airdrops

i always ask to filter out early sellers

i prefer retention

cto @ bwl.gg, 100M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 $eggs is life

A girl in a TOMBOY 🌎
(Shaping in /autist)

Crypto data is available publicly OnChain. So everyone can see what ppl do from their accounts with OnChain assets.

But also the merkle team has a lot of data available for teams that want to airdrop to filter through when they decide who to drop to

Web3 Strategy & Growth Consultant | Transforming Complex Tech into Real-World Success | Bridging Innovation & Impact.

The 🧉🐻⚔️

/glanker

Empire Builder

Yeah. For the trust part, it's necessary at times, though the majority of mini-apps builders here are anonymous. Like sayangel, or cashlessman .eth... I've never seen compez dox too.

I defs respect that 🫡 

As the cofounder of EmpireBuilder /glanker I decided to merge my OnChain identity with my professional IRL a bit ago & am good with that. As it helps with project trust ofc

Part of the reason why I may probably never dox. Putting out too much personal info out there is a no-no imo