Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions
🌈 YON
@yonfrula
when someone deploys a clanker, a portion of the fees goes to the creator — but the bigger cut goes to clanker itself. over time, they've stacked a massive pile of community tokens through fees alone (which i assume they won't sell). now imagine if they burned all those creator tokens and only kept the $CLANKER in their vaults. would be nice.
10 replies
3 recasts
36 reactions
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
No, imagine if they instead earmarked these tokens to support creators and artists via mint incentive protocols like boost dot xyz, layer 3 and (shameless self-shill) @betrmint. This is the win-win-win arrangement I tried to pitch proxy on but we never quite got there. I still believe it’s a huge positive sum opportunity. @dish @btayengco bang my line when the oceans calm a little 😂
2 replies
1 recast
13 reactions
yerbearserker.base.eth 🧉
@yerbearserker
Ive actually been thinking about that flow for EmpireBuilder, as we get 20% on tokens deployed through us, & the vision/goal is to symbiotically and generatively grow their ecosystem for all participants 🫡
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
Yes I owe you a post Farcon dm my friend, let’s chat
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
