Ethereum

All Core Devs - Consensus (ACDC) #157
* fusaka-devnet-0 May 26
* ACDT focus on upgrade N, ACD{C/E} focus on upgrade N+1

* Summary by @ralexstokes 
* Recording on YouTube & @ethcatherders X/Podcast

https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/acdc-157/23980/2

Herding Knowledge, Building Community, Homesteading Ethereum! A public goods project enhancing the ecosystem to foster a cohesive, informed Ethereum community.

Former editor: Week in Ethereum News; 
Creator: Block Horses; 
GitHub: http://github.com/abcoathup; 
father + autistic + #vegan he/him House Ethereum

Given that the additional blob space capacity provided by Pectra isn't consumed yet, what is the argument for keeping a high priority on PeerDAS instead of prioritizing something else, like shorter block times or single slot finality?

It looks like L2s are doing fine. Why do we keep catering to them in the short term instead of focussing more energy on other "neglected" areas?

This is the alt account of Sister Hazel. Writings at https://powerlaw.systems. Curating https://protocol-particles.github.io.

I agree with that. But that doesn't answer my question. What informs our priorities for the next 12 months?

There are a whole heap of use cases for really low cost L2 transactions that are yet to be switched on.

One of the first Eth stakers 🥩 in Mexico. Building platica.mx.

Just a curious guy that likes to build things. 

Context switching is something that the engineers have to do. And what we just confirmed with EOF is that engineers do whatever it takes in order to serve the network and its users.

I agree we need more blob space. My question is when? We can probably shift focus now and shift it back again. 

We should all ask more often what the game changer material is RIGHT NOW. 

Plans are there to serve us, not the other way around.

We will need blobspace. And we can do some things now without a hard fork. For example gas to 60 million.

I believe context switching is more expensive in overall capacity of the network.