genuine q: any tips on where I can read the best explanation for why user's shouldn't be concerned about the lack of fraud proofs on optimism? cc

Building. Prior: VP at Adobe, GM of Behance, co-founder of the Content Authenticity Initiative, early days at TED. https://williamallen.com

Contributor to crypto, building at World / TFH, co-founder of PoolTogether Inc, instigator of pleasrDAO

https://leighton.mirror.xyz/

The nuance is that there is almost no security benefit to fault proofs unless: 1. anyone can submit a challenge
2. the admin multisig cannot push an upgrade that preempts a challenge

Arbitrum’s upcoming BOLD mechanism is the first that can actually enable this. Optimism plans to spend less time with training wheels.

building degencast.wtf /degencast, ex-synfutures, binance, bitmain

Chiang Mai, Mueang Chiang Mai District, Chiang Mai, Thailand

But ultimately they need to ship in order to maintain the trust.

ppl choose to trust the founders just like we choose to trust dwr will not charge 8 dollars per month for warpcast

It’s actually unbelievable noone else speaks of this and it’s had so much buy-in.

Like is everyone just saying ‘bob likes it, must be ok’ ?