I wonder if in the future people will be considered influential based on their token distribution and market cap instead of their follower count

And other stuff, like if a piece of content will be considered more newsworthy and/or credible based on the number of people who hold it -- I guess Polymarket already to a degree, but more widespread and built in to familiar experiences... e.g. upvoting, like we see in Reddit and Hacker News, an upvote being a unit of a link or piece of content that itself is a tradable market

⚡️ Build → ship → repeat 🧬 Ex: @base core team, @coinbase, bitcoin.org 📖 Editor: Mastering Bitcoin & Ethereum ✨ Making apps, sharing results

On-chain creative + graphic designer with extensive experience in advertising.

I wish influence was determined by the level of their Pokemon...

The social aspect of Debank sort of works like this.