Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
In my ideal world, "mute user" is a protocol reaction, and I have a bot that I configured to mute any user who replies with specific keywords. The bot has a website where I can go and mute/unmute users too.
4 replies
3 recasts
20 reactions
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Most people don’t want their mute to be public. There is an expectation of privacy given how Twitter and other networks treat it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
OK. But what if Warpcast agreed to honor MESSAGE_TYPE_LINK_ADD("mute")? No pressure to use it, maybe not even offer the option, but honor it if I use it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
This way, 99% of the users will keep using the default functionality offered by clients, but some users (probably the ones that need it the most), could use more advanced tools.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
