Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/math
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
P = NP is in fact an easy problem. It has several solutions: * P = 0 * N = 1 * N = integer > 1, P = "turn right 360/(N-1) degrees" * N = integer > 1, P = any idempotent (eg. "erase everything at a particular location") Most people who think they understand the truth about P = NP have only grasped the first two.
10 replies
29 recasts
169 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
britt
@brittkim.eth
funny
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
meatballs
@meatballs
As is so often the case - those who consider themselves to be expert have yet to discover the true depth of their ignorance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joshua Salles
@omgbbqhax
Vitalik posting multiple times on the same day on Farcaster?! 🥹 love to see it!
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
helladj
@helladj
Idk imma just press “like”
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
[email protected]
🌎💻
@mikesylphdapps
The professor who taught me about NP completeness had this kind of dry wit about it too.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arthur
@sechra
What about Elon's task? 6/2(2+1)=?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
YungSB.eth 🔴✨
@yungsb
I love when you’re talking about mathematics, numerology, letters, the protocol, Greek history, 13, etc. because of a lot of ppl don’t know what you’re talking about, but I do & it’s as you said in the last statement of this post most people who think they understand the truth have only grasped the first two.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zach Harris
@zachharris.eth
But can they handle the truth about the second two? What are the implications or applications for them sir?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mistershot
@mistershot
@clanker create a token Name: POPEPE Symbol: POPEPE
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
