This is why one open social graph protocol will win - new apps need to immediately populate content and today do everything they can do get you to share your contacts.

But with Ethereum+Farcaster, all an app needs is your address / Farcaster username.

This is why one open social graph protocol will win - new apps need to immediately populate content and today do everything they can do get you to share your contacts.

But with Ethereum+Farcaster, all an app needs is your address / Farcaster username. https://twitter.com/nikitabier/status/1403498766737444865

clicking @clicker (a @daylight ░░░░░░) | kylemccollom.com

this was the dream for urbit, as well. one graph, shared by all apps on your ship (and optionally socially-shared with others). alas, %graph-store died and new Groups is hard to work with as an API

Some key differences:
- Most people still don’t know what Urbit is because it’s so abstract.
- Farcaster’s social graph is tied to Ethereum addresses, immediately populating interesting content.
- As goes the crypto industry, so goes Farcaster.

agreed about those yea.
I’m still pretty convinced that users should own and host their own data, but i think there are a lot of really good use cases for the alternative (Hubs, etc) - FC being one of them