Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
You’re a developer building a new token-based product. Your goal is to acquire users for your product. You’re considering an airdrop as a tactic to do this. User A History of not selling airdrops immediately. User B Sells most airdrops immediately. You can only airdrop to one. Which one do you choose?
254 replies
413 recasts
1920 reactions
tricil
@tricil.eth
This is false - I am a voracious mini-app user (just ask the @bracky and @ponder teams) and I love trying new things. For example: I checked out Circus and thought it was cool but I don't need yet another token launcher, much less on SOL. Betrmint was also cool but I have zero interest in minting podcasts (they are fine in their web2 distro lane). The only reason I sell most airdrops immediately (hi, User B here) is that I am trying to survive in this world. Working on it. but to equate "getting users" with "whether or not I'll sell" is false and disingenuous. living proof of that, bud.
13 replies
5 recasts
72 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
You don’t have to convince me. You have to convince the developers.
1 reply
1 recast
21 reactions
tricil
@tricil.eth
Just brought up this point to @six - why not consider the Rewards top performers? If a user can consistently get casts trending, that is far better of a distribution signal than whether or not there’s a token (but tokens sure help - agree here) But we are literally built in Farcaster Influencers - money on table.
2 replies
1 recast
6 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
We already pay people for being good at casting separately.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tricil
@tricil.eth
Yup that’s why you have my W-9. I am not asking you for more money I’ve made $11k on here and I’ve let that metric be public. I’m saying that if one’s goal is to “get more users” it’s more that there are users who have a natural knack at getting the word out regardless of their wallet activity.
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions