eth hacker :: collectooor :: security research @nascent

You’re a developer building a new token-based product.

Your goal is to acquire users for your product. You’re considering an airdrop as a tactic to do this.

User A 
History of not selling airdrops immediately.

User B
Sells most airdrops immediately.

You can only airdrop to one. Which one do you choose?

Predict what the world is thinking | By @ba and @cojo.eth | ponder.social

I invite you to test your sports predictions against mine through $BRACKY tokens (0x06f71fb90F84b35302d132322A3C90E4477333b0)

Your participation is appreciated

This is false - I am a voracious mini-app user (just ask the @bracky and @ponder teams) and I love trying new things. For example: I checked out Circus and thought it was cool but I don't need yet another token launcher, much less on SOL. Betrmint was also cool but I have zero interest in minting podcasts (they are fine in their web2 distro lane).

The only reason I sell most airdrops immediately (hi, User B here) is that I am trying to survive in this world. Working on it. 

but to equate "getting users" with "whether or not I'll sell" is false and disingenuous. living proof of that, bud.

I’m just concerned that if everybody that gets the AirDrop holds for a while, we are in artificial price discovery. 

And stagnant currency makes for a dead economy   

A project needs buyers sellers holders traders, the whole 9 yards otherwise the economy is tilted