You’re a developer building a new token-based product.

Your goal is to acquire users for your product. You’re considering an airdrop as a tactic to do this.

User A 
History of not selling airdrops immediately.

User B
Sells most airdrops immediately.

You can only airdrop to one. Which one do you choose?

The case for user B Selling is Not Synonymous with Disengagement, User B may sell, but that action provides liquidity. That’s essential for price discovery and a healthy token economy. Without sellers, you don’t really have buyers, The assumption that holders are “better” users is overly simplistic. User A might be passively holding tokens without engaging, whereas User B might be actively testing, casting, building, or even critiquing which adds far more value than silent holding.

𝘺𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘧𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳.

It does add, but most are dormant users not even transactions, majorly holding because they ain’t active.

holding literally adds value - yall arguing fantasies over what happens on a chart 😂