Again I do not care. If I did, I wouldn’t sleep at night. 

The minute I release the tokens they are gone, I let the market decide. 

The thinking goes into working out what’s the right amount. It’s wasted effort trying to micro manage people. 

- when I bribe Aerodrome votes.
 
- when I sponsor a project like @warpslot or @toadyhawk.eth 

- when I do deposit incentives directly on /veil

At the same time, I also love @apex777.eth’s attitude about this: Tokens are for tokenizing attention, so just set them free and get back to building while the market does its thing. You can’t not respect that.

Building /veil -- ZK Privacy Protocol for Base

noun seven three zero | onchain experimentation maxi @ zerorights.media, zeropod.xyz, @betrmint, the /yellow collective

also these corps have hundreds of millions in mcap and complain about folks selling $5 lmao

exploring new frontiers in tech, ai, crypto, farcaster DAU since 2023, product designer since 2018, portfolio → /basedstudio

it seems like some of them are judging from the casts dan is posting, if some of those specifically asking for folks who don't sell pointless $5 worth drops

This is where most of the confusion is coming from imo. @dwr.eth is not complaining. Not of the airdroppers are complaining. 

But if a project, during the process of setting up an airdrop, has the option to exclude people who repeatedly and immediately sell their airdrops, do you think they are likely to do so?

(Spoiler alert: They are.)

curious how exactly is it calculated

but in the end it means more / bigger drops for us