df pfp
df
@df
the 2 year anniversary of warpcast channels just passed and they're still not in the farcaster protocol and third party clients still can't fully build on them makes me sad insufficiently decentralized https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/92
5 replies
4 recasts
41 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
FIP-2 has been in the protocol day 1. Our version of channel metadata has not worked. No point in enshrining something that’s not working.
1 reply
3 recasts
18 reactions

df pfp
df
@df
you can have permissionless channels without enshrining something that isn't working - for example make them NFTs that are used as FIP-2 targets; can always migrate to a more farcaster-opinionated approach later
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
You can use FIP-2 with NFTs today. The first channels were NFTs. What people want with “channels” is the distribution and UX in the Farcaster app. Every iteration of the UX has failed along a major dimension in that regard. @sahil and a few others are working on a proposal to simplify and migrate existing channels into a better format.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

sahil pfp
sahil
@sahil
yep proposal for channels coming soon fwiw all the iterations have given us a good idea of what's working with channels and what do channel users/mods really want.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

The Dude Bart🐘🌳 ⌐◨-◨ pfp
The Dude Bart🐘🌳 ⌐◨-◨
@thedude
What do you think we really want? Also, was cool meeting and talking to you at farcon!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction