Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr
In you're in favor of "AI safety" (broad definition), what's your most compelling cast-length argument?
40 replies
30 recasts
104 reactions
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
An AI may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. An AI must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. An AI must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction