Happy for New Yorkers! If you can’t move to California—bring California to you!

I don’t think I’m on TikTok enough to understand why anyone would have voted for him.

ask @greg but here are some screenshots

also there’s videos of girls screaming “M-A-M-D-A-N-I Andrew Cuomo you need to DIE”

I like baking /goodbread and building apps on web3 protocols. DevRel @ ENS Labs

Building a little space by the ocean called /thenextwave and watching everything on /videolab.

building farcaster | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina | “lucky me, lucky mud” 🤠

here's a rare (in my experience) video pointing out some potential flaws. notice all the comments are shitting on the creator

I feel The Times did Rob Henderson wrong dropping him into a TikTok edit to explain luxury beliefs. Might as well drop him in the ocean to explain water to fish lol.

I also wonder how the same content would be received with a different messenger - not someone in a suit.

here's a rare (in my experience) video pointing out some potential flaws. notice all the comments are shitting on the creator https://www.tiktok.com/@thetimes/video/7519536465844440342

ya these are good examples

the interesting part is how much of a united front it is. feels like every comment is in full support, 0 hesitation

"that's my mayor!! (i'm canadian)"
"NYC please don't fumble the mayor of a lifetime"
"my biggest complaint is that he isn't eligible for president"

Emily Ratajkowski was a campaign surrogate for him? Fascinating.

I just had dinner with a friend visiting the Bay Area. She's a prominent politician in her country, where she can't walk down the street without getting stopped. She set a historical record by winning her election at a young age and built a large social media following.

We talked about the various platforms and their distributions. She said the TikTok team courted her early on and guaranteed her *60 million views* if she joined. She turned their offer down. Later, they onboarded her opposition and gave them instant distribution.

The reach that TikTok can give smaller creators is incredible, sometimes life-altering. But TikTok can also give reach to select individuals in ways that bypass organic user activity and, in some cases, negotiate political influence behind closed doors.

In contrast, it can be hard to get seen on Farcaster. I saw this frustration expressed across many of the 4,000+ casts I went through in 48 hours. I also saw the team engaging with this issue with transparency and experimentation.

No one here can be guaranteed an easy path to virality. Maybe that's not such a bad thing. Maybe, in these complex times, it’s actually a reason to stick around.

wild, i think tiktok is incredibly dangerous for this reason and understand why so many politicians in the US want it to be banned because it a) can guarantee distribution, but more importantly b) keep you in that in-group for the duration of the campaign. for both sides! but really depends on who is controlling it.

On a somewhat related note:

https://farcaster.xyz/patriciaxlee.eth/0xc50e3a5c

I didn't seek out any information but knew mamdani's policies from his literature and ground game across Brooklyn.
I have no idea what Cuomo's policy positions were. Seemed like he believed he could just run on name (and that name is tainted anyway)