Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/synbio
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
crazy but most biology experiments are still done by hand (e.g. pipetting, mixing). leveraging AI for biological progress is only as good as the data, but that data is bottlenecked by human hands just as LLMs are by text. biology won’t accelerate until robots + software primarily run experiments. big opportunity.
8 replies
2 recasts
32 reactions

Gramajo pfp
Gramajo
@gramajo.eth
It’s why biotech companies are spending a shit ton on data scientist and some of the data we capture is HUGE
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
yes but data still so limited in grand scheme of things!!! like all the protein folding predictions are still limited by current data and experiments
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gramajo pfp
Gramajo
@gramajo.eth
I think it depends what pov you’re looking at it from. Coming from the rare diseases space (PKU, Hemophilia, etc) there was sometimes less than 2,000 globally with our diseases so there is only so much experimentation you can do. When I switched to oncology the numbers where way higher but a lot of the usage of our drugs expanded bc of experiments
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction