Josh Stark
@0xstark.eth
Here's a more digestible thread summarizing my post "Making Sense of Trust Experience" https://stark.mirror.xyz/rkLEVz9p4r3ouusD-WCkWP_iVZYkZ0K7TFkzeRfiXCU
3 replies
8 recasts
27 reactions
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
I think about this piece before going to bed at night. This is not a joke. S/o @chaskin.eth
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Josh Stark
@0xstark.eth
what do you think about it? post really intended to start a dialogue: what should Ethereum's TX be? what are the goals of TX? what is missing? who can contribute? how?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
I look at it from the frame of “what products are possible knowing a higher degree of TX can be delivered” For example, FC is built upon a TX for users and developers that they will have access to their social graph and ability to tinker forever, respectively.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
But so far, mass market doesn’t care bc X/FB deliver a good enough TX to 90% or so of their users. TX are also built over a long period of time, and not immediately valuable like dopamine from TikTok. Is there a way to provide people with a quicker “dopamine” hit for this new medium for TXs?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
I think about your other post ‘AIB’ quite a lot as well. Hardness is one of the blockchains most important characteristics. But showing why it is valuable to users is tough, showing to builders why it’s valuable has been more easy.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
