amosnena
@amosnena
These changes seem like an interesting step to improve the dynamics, but I have a question about the expected results. If the goal is to foster diversity in interaction, how does this address the current limitations of the system? 1. Limited visibility: The algorithm tends to prioritize showing content from accounts with which we already interact, which makes it difficult to obtain "likes" from different people. 2. Monopolized trending: The same accounts usually appear in the "trending" feed, which reduces the chances for other creators to be discovered. 3. Interaction with larger accounts: When we try to interact with larger accounts, it is uncommon to receive a response. This discourages interaction and can affect our reputation if those interactions are not reciprocated, leading us to be categorized as "spam". Will there be additional adjustments to address these barriers, such as improving the distribution of content in the feed or promoting interaction between accounts of different levels of reach? Without solving this, it could be complicated for the proposed improvements to actually encourage diversity and participation
0 reply
2 recasts
7 reactions
Natalia🎩💜
@tashacrypt.eth
I completely agree with your arguments
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
amosnena
@amosnena
Thank you for your attention, dear. We'll see what results we get. I don't think anyone from the team will read it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction