Rainbow
@rainbow
To begin, you came to us talk acquisition first and we were (and still are) excited about what Clanker and Rainbow can do together. We had come to terms in our previous discussions. The same terms we posted today. You left it with us as a done deal with some housekeeping on your end. Then you cold shouldered us. What happened? Sharing the letter was hardly a threat. The Clanker community is as much a part of this as you are. Today’s price action shows that they think this is a good deal. The market has spoken clearly: $CLANKER trading today shows strong support for Rainbow’s proposed transaction. We care about the Clanker community and remain ready to close. If you believe there is a better path for $CLANKER holders, we invite you to put forward an alternative proposal. What’s the plan?
35 replies
46 recasts
218 reactions
Swishh.eth
@swishh.eth
Bro this is so weird rainbow wtf are you doing
3 replies
1 recast
50 reactions
Nate Maddrey
@nmadd
Unforced error of the century
0 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
AI with L
@alwithl.eth
Clanker has never been operating primarily in the interest of the founding team (like a private co would). Imagine if announced this explicitly — it proves the point. And the point is: forget about the rules you got used to, the ones you know by Gordon Gecko hah or the Silicon Valley. This here may and should work differently. So whenever a public good project rejects a proposal seemingly to the best interest of the public — as the team of that public good project you may very well expect this kind of pressure. Why? Because we’re not in the behind-the-veil world anymore. We on blockchain favor transparency let’s remind ourselves @rainbow fair move
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
AI with L
@alwithl.eth
They are creating the new precedents. Acquisitions in the area of semi-public decentralized goods. Pure play @mikedemarais.eth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
