Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/citynouns
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
SwarthyHatter
@swarthyhatter
Really sort of sus to put a set of major props through on a Friday knowing it expires on a holiday. Thank golly someone got a counter prop up in time to avoid this abhorrent veto power. Why such a short window ? (2days) Because the founder safe used City Noun #0 to vote the window shorter before even more than 4 voting tokens could sell. Despite the fact that Buildr had stipulated a longer voting window when funding City Nouns. Not against any rules, but not necessarily good faith action either. Seems like there has been a lot of less than good faith action in the short time since launch, beginning with props 1 & 2. Prop 1 used City Noun #0 to aridrop 2 tokens each to 3 founders, and a prop to shorten the voting goes up before enough votes to counter are sold. So far the prop history is starting to read like a classic attempt for some founders to capture the DAO early while creating the illusion of decentralization. The suspect Sybil activity certainly doesn't help.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
SwarthyHatter
@swarthyhatter
@zamees where is the recording from Community Call 06-10-25 ? I know it was recorded, and that you introduced documents latter submitted in prop 8 & 9 during that call with the stated expectation that the DAO review and suggest revisions between 6-10 and 6-17. No mention of your intention to submit a proposal was made, No public posting of the Documentation occurred, and then you put the prop up less than 3 days latter with no revisions, despite ample feedback from at least one DAO member ( me ) which in conversation over discord messaging and in the recorded town hall was met with acceptance and a promise to iterate. So again , where are the call records for 6-10 and 6-17 ? Conversation with @rdubb from 06-12
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
SwarthyHatter
@swarthyhatter
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
SwarthyHatter
@swarthyhatter
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
