Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/citynouns
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

SwarthyHatter pfp
SwarthyHatter
@swarthyhatter
I’d be remiss not to clearly state this: the issue with Prop 10 is not a personal dispute — it’s about potential Sybil activity tied to the Gnosis Safe. Multiple parties believe a founder may control more than one signer wallet. That’s a serious red flag, and it wouldn’t even be a question if DAO process had been followed and Safe signers were approved through a public proposal and vote. What makes this even more concerning is the precedent set in Props 8 and 9 — both of which consolidated decision-making authority without broader consent. We’re now looking at a compounding pattern of centralization and process bypassing. If we care about the integrity of City Nouns governance, this vote matters. Time to summon the vote. @metamu @civilmonkey @zaal @scottrepreneur.eth @oceanandsea @failoften @hildabroom @digitaldreams @fattybuthappy https://nouns.build/dao/base/0xdf4f168ba41c88ab4d0f1e2117110600c7e44b6d/vote/10?tab=votes
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction