citynouns

I’d be remiss not to clearly state this: the issue with Prop 10 is not a personal dispute — it’s about potential Sybil activity tied to the Gnosis Safe. Multiple parties believe a founder may control more than one signer wallet. That’s a serious red flag, and it wouldn’t even be a question if DAO process had been followed and Safe signers were approved through a public proposal and vote.

What makes this even more concerning is the precedent set in Props 8 and 9 — both of which consolidated decision-making authority without broader consent. We’re now looking at a compounding pattern of centralization and process bypassing. If we care about the integrity of City Nouns governance, this vote matters.

Time to summon the vote.
@metamu @civilmonkey @zaal @scottrepreneur.eth @oceanandsea @failoften @hildabroom @digitaldreams @fattybuthappy 

https://nouns.build/dao/base/0xdf4f168ba41c88ab4d0f1e2117110600c7e44b6d/vote/10?tab=votes

I mean we haven't even been able to address other red flags yet. Like the use of @zamees  wallet being used to settle and and start DAO auctions rather than the DAO safe. Like this shizzz is cray cray and not OK. If prop 10 doesn't pass , we have no recourse for addressing all of the other problems an audit is sure to illuminate.

Author, groovy thinker, artist, generalist, web3 enthusiast, traveler, co-founder of City Nouns.