Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/dev-21
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
I don’t use Next.js unless it makes sense or I absolutely have to. I will admit it’s good when you need full SSR like for e-commerce, but the trade offs are rough imo
3 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
Frank
@deboboy
I’m still building with Nextjs because a] Lee Robinson is a kind and generous DevRel leader, b] their documentation is high value and updated. But, a few apps on the idea bench could use a new frameWORK. Pitch me the value of Vite < 160 characters.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
Fast, portable, and flexible Bundles and runs extremely fast No vendor lock-in, deploy almost anywhere Loads of plugins and compatibility across the ecosystem I will clarify that there is a big difference between Next and Vite though Vite is a bundler, similar to webpack. You can use multiple frameworks with it like React, Svelte, etc. It simply helps bundle and run your frontend code, and doesn't necessarily mean it will be SSR. That depends how you deploy it. Next.js is an opinionated SSR framework that uses react with a bunch of other proprietary Vercel tools. It's specially designed to be run on Vercel, which means while you can try to self host it or deploy it elsewhere, you will have issues due to the tightness of that integration. It's why 3 different teams are building a more open and compatible version of Next that still isn't quite there https://opennext.js.org
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Frank
@deboboy
Appreciate the pitch; will give it a try
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
