Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/dev-21
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Steve pfp
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
I don’t use Next.js unless it makes sense or I absolutely have to. I will admit it’s good when you need full SSR like for e-commerce, but the trade offs are rough imo
3 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

Frank pfp
Frank
@deboboy
I’m still building with Nextjs because a] Lee Robinson is a kind and generous DevRel leader, b] their documentation is high value and updated. But, a few apps on the idea bench could use a new frameWORK. Pitch me the value of Vite < 160 characters.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Vaxitas pfp
Vaxitas
@vaxitas.eth
I honestly think Vite's more than enough for SSR/SSG needs. It doesn't enforce filesystem based routing and you can fetch whatever data you need to render such pages in a single script and also hydrate. Personally, the main advantage to using Next for me (and most others who come from a frontend background) has been the ease of deployment. I don't think that's a strong enough incentive to keep up with an ever changing ecosystem. Might as well learn CI/CD stuff instead.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Hirugohan pfp
Hirugohan
@hirugohan
I personally have been dropping nextjs for so long, unless job requires me to do it. my go to always has been react-vite. its also for the sake of DX and reducing the abstraction. when I need a backend, I spin up a hono API. well previously I was using remixjs, but remix's decision to move into react-router framework is the most confusing decision I've ever used. so here I am with the most simple stack.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction