3 replies
0 recast
14 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Who is actually driven by a $3 reward?
Not airdrop farmers — they’re here for a significant amount via asymmetric upside and billion-dollar airdrops, not nominal rewards.
Not professional creators — they’re looking for real sustainable monetization pathways (and other platforms like YouTube, Substack, have mature ecosystems), not pocket change.
Not deep peripatetic thinker creators — they thrive on discourse, recognition, and shaping ideas through walk and talks.
Not conversational participants — they’re here to exchange thoughts, get laughs, share insights.
Not mere observers — they want to learn, follow, and occasionally engage, not farm incentives.
So… who is the $3 for?
If the answer is “no one who matters to the network long-term,” maybe it’s time to rethink the focus on incentive rewards entirely.
the content that rewards generate. posts about "trying to break through to the top 30" is some of the worst content on this platform imo. 0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction