Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/daos
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gramajo pfp
Gramajo
@gramajo.eth
Thoughts? Seems like a winner take all situation. Still wrapping my head around it. https://x.com/0xalpo/status/1933202267051843744
2 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

stellaachenbach pfp
stellaachenbach
@stellaachenbach
Stupid question but why would we need multiple proposals around one decision? Isn't that introducing complexity where it might not be needed? I understand different type of voting decisions but isn't a good debate still useful to not just be in our own heads?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gramajo pfp
Gramajo
@gramajo.eth
Nah not stupid at all. I’m also trying to understand it. An example that came to mind for me would be maybe irl activations? So ex: Nouns wants a presence at Farcon, instead of getting multiple props for one irl activation for the same thing, this could make it so it’s one and done but all get evaluated in one go? 🤷‍♂️ Maybe we’re over engineering it as DAOs can sometimes do 😂
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction